production: be in south africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in south africa 1.00
be important in south africa 0.98
be popular in south africa 0.97
be important in africa 0.92
be popular in africa 0.91
be important in south african economy 0.85
is west 0.79
be important in african economy 0.78
was in south 0.77
be in india 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(production, be in south africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(production, be in south africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be important in africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(production, be in south africa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sector, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(production, be in south africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sector, be important in south africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be important in africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in south africa)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, is west)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(production, be in south africa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sector, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(production, be in south africa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(production, be in south africa)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be important in africa)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(production, be in south africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(manufacturing, is west)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, is west)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was in south)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(production, be in south africa)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(production, be important in south african economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(production, be important in south african economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(production, be important in african economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(production, be important in south african economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(production, be important in african economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(production, be important in african economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in south african economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in african economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(production, be in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sector, be important in south africa)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be important in africa)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manufacturing, is west)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sector, be important in south africa)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be important in africa)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(production, be in south africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa)