prosecutor: present fact at trial

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.67
, attorney
Weight: 0.62
, defendant
Weight: 0.60
, police officer
Weight: 0.57
, actor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings defense attorney
Weight: 0.67
, lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, investigator
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.34
, sheriff
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
present fact at trial 1.00
present case 0.87
present your case to court 0.84
be involve in trial 0.84
present evidence 0.80
prove case 0.79
prove their case 0.79
be defined as accuse in trial 0.78
case you 0.77
rest his case in court 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(police officer, case you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attorney, prove case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attorney, prove case)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(police officer, case you)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, case you)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(attorney, prove case)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove case)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove their case)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attorney, prove case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(police officer, case you) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, present case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present case)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lawyer, prove their case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove their case)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lawyer, prove case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.04
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(prosecutor, present fact at trial)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(prosecutor, present evidence)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present evidence)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(prosecutor, present evidence)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, present evidence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(police officer, case you)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(attorney, prove case)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, present case)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove their case)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove case)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lawyer, be involve in trial)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(police officer, case you)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(attorney, prove case)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(prosecutor, present fact at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)