public transport: help environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
help environment 1.00
be better for environment 0.90
be bad for environment 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(public transport, help environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(public transport, help environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(public transport, help environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(public transport, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)