rally: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.67
, action
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, gathering
Weight: 0.56
Siblings march
Weight: 0.36
, parade
Weight: 0.34
, demonstration
Weight: 0.34
, national convention
Weight: 0.33
, memorial day
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
CAN good 0.78
affect water quality 0.78
is bad month 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rally, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rally, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rally, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(march, is bad month)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rally, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rally, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rally, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(demonstration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(march, is bad month) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(march, is bad month)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rally, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rally, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rally, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rally, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rally, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(march, is bad month)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rally, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)