rat: be pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pet 1.00
be used to pet 0.99
be use as pet 0.94
be at pet store 0.94
be keep as pet 0.93
be at pet shop 0.92
make great pet 0.89
be used to cuddly pet 0.86
be a part of animal 0.80
be at georgia pet shop 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rat, be pet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rat, be pet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rat, be pet)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rat, be pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rodent, make great pet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at pet store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at georgia pet shop)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be a part of animal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rat, be pet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rat, be pet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rat, be pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rat, be pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lizard, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at pet store)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(monkey, be at georgia pet shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at georgia pet shop)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rabbit, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be a part of animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(rat, be pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rat, be pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(rabbit, be a part of animal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lizard, be at pet store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(monkey, be at georgia pet shop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet)