rodent: make great pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, vermin
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, rat
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
make great pet 1.00
be used to pet 0.89
be pet 0.89
be keep as pet 0.88
be use as pet 0.87
be at pet store 0.86
be at pet shop 0.85
be used to cuddly pet 0.81
be at great outdoors 0.79
be defined as only animal that have hair 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rat, be pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at great outdoors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rodent, make great pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rodent, make great pet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rodent, make great pet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rodent, make great pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rat, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rat, be pet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beaver, be at great outdoors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at great outdoors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rodent, make great pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rodent, make great pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beaver, be at great outdoors)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rat, be pet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(rodent, make great pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)