record: sound better than music

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents achievement
Weight: 0.68
, mark
Weight: 0.66
, evidence
Weight: 0.59
, proof
Weight: 0.58
Siblings performance
Weight: 0.65
, date
Weight: 0.64
, old testament
Weight: 0.63
, recording
Weight: 0.61
, contract
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
sound better than music 1.00
sound better than digital music 0.94
produce sound 0.83
play music 0.83
make different sounds 0.82
hold music 0.80
sound higher pitched 0.78
be better than cds 0.77
has quality better 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(recording, sound higher pitched)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(recording, sound higher pitched)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(recording, sound higher pitched)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(record, sound better than music)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(record, produce sound)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(record, make different sounds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than digital music)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(record, sound better than digital music)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(record, produce sound)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(record, be better than cds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(record, hold music)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(record, make different sounds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(record, play music)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(record, make different sounds)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(record, sound better than digital music)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(record, produce sound)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(record, be better than cds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(record, play music)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(record, hold music)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(record, be better than cds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(record, make different sounds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(record, produce sound)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(record, play music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(record, hold music)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(record, play music)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(record, sound better than digital music)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(record, be better than cds)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(record, hold music)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(record, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(record, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(record, sound better than music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(recording, sound higher pitched)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)