performance: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, record
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.64
, success
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.63
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.64
, achievement
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality system 0.84
be better than quantity 0.82
be improved 0.78
sound better than music 0.77
be more important than quantity 0.76
be more important than speed 0.76
be at better center 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(display, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(success, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(record, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(success, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(success, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(record, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(success, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(record, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(record, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, be improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(display, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(record, sound better than music)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(success, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(display, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quality, be improved)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(success, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(achievement, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be more important than speed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(display, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(success, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(record, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(success, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, sound better than music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(quality, be more important than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(achievement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(achievement, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(accuracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(accuracy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(accuracy, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(accuracy, be more important than speed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be more important than speed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(performance, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(success, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(success, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(record, sound better than music)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(record, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(display, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(achievement, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(accuracy, be more important than speed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(accuracy, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(success, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(success, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(record, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(record, sound better than music)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(display, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(performance, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quality, be more important than quantity)