registration: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fee
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.59
, action
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cash register
Weight: 0.34
, admission
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.32
, postage stamp
Weight: 0.32
, postal service
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
get more expensive 0.90
be in market expensive 0.86
be more expensive for less 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
be more expensive for less now 0.85
be much more costly today 0.84
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.84
be on cheaper 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(registration, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(registration, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(registration, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(registration, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(registration, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(registration, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(registration, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(registration, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(registration, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)