regulation: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
was good 0.84
has quality system 0.84
has quality worst 0.80
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
has quality marks 0.77
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prohibition, was good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protection, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(protection, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality evil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulator, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prohibition, was good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(interpretation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(interpretation, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(regulator, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mandate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(interpretation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(interpretation, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mandate, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mandate, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(legislation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality questions)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(legislation, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(regulation, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(regulation, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(regulation, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prohibition, is good thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(regulator, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(interpretation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(interpretation, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality evil)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prohibition, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(regulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)