relief: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, benefit
Weight: 0.58
, comfort
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings emergency
Weight: 0.31
, headache
Weight: 0.31
, ease
Weight: 0.31
, time zone
Weight: 0.31
, suffering
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related to change 0.87
be related to number 0.86
be related to area 0.85
be associated with use 0.82
be related to numbers 0.81
be related to social change 0.81
solve related 0.80
is unrelated 0.79
be related use examples 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(factor, be related to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to area)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to numbers)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to number)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(time zone, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(relief, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(relief, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(relief, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(factor, be related to numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(relief, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(relief, be related)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(relief, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(time zone, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(time zone, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(relief, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(relief, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(time zone, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(relief, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)