restaurant: charge too much for food

Related concepts

Parents	grocery store Weight: 0.68 , institution Weight: 0.64 , accommodation Weight: 0.64 , food store Weight: 0.62
Siblings	italian restaurant Weight: 0.87 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.81 , steakhouse Weight: 0.80 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.80 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property	Similarity
charge too much for food	1.00
be used to get some food	0.84
be used to get food	0.82
has food in them	0.82
has food that be in can	0.81
has more product than food	0.79
be used to food	0.79
be used to eat fast food	0.78
has cheap food	0.78
be used to eat food	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(grocery store, has food that be in can) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(grocery store, has food in them) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(food store, has more product than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(grocery store, has food in them)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(food store, has more product than food)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(grocery store, has food that be in can)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(grocery store, has food in them)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(food store, has more product than food)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(grocery store, has food that be in can)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get some food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to get food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(grocery store, has food that be in can) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(grocery store, has food in them) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(food store, has more product than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to get food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to get food)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get some food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get some food)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to eat food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to eat food)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to food)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(restaurant, charge too much for food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(grocery store, has food that be in can)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(grocery store, has food in them)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(food store, has more product than food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get some food)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat fast food)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to get food)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to food)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to eat food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(grocery store, has food that be in can)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(grocery store, has food in them)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(restaurant, charge too much for food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(food store, has more product than food)