risk: take bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.67
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
, attribute
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings high blood pressure
Weight: 0.71
, drug use
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.63
, obesity
Weight: 0.62
, interest
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
take bad 1.00
take part 0.84
minimise bad thing 0.80
take necessary part 0.80
take in business 0.80
take part of life 0.79
has quality bad 0.78
take necessary part of life 0.78
taking then women 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(obesity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(high blood pressure, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(risk, take bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(risk, take necessary part)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(risk, take part)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(risk, take necessary part of life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(risk, take part of life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(risk, take part of life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(risk, take necessary part of life)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(risk, take necessary part)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(risk, take part of life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(risk, take part)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(risk, take in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(risk, take in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(risk, take in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(risk, take part of life)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(risk, taking then women)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(risk, taking then women)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(risk, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(risk, take part)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(risk, take necessary part of life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(risk, take in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(risk, taking then women)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(risk, take necessary part)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(risk, taking then women)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(risk, take part)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(risk, take necessary part of life)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(risk, take necessary part)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(high blood pressure, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality bad)