:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rooster, be pet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rooster, be pet)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bird, be good pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rooster, be pet)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bird, be good pet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bird, be pet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, be pet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bird, be good pet)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(llama, be pet)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(llama, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(llama, be pet)
Salient implies Plausible
0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rooster, be pet)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rooster, be pet)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bird, be good pet)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(llama, be pet)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(rooster, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)