rubbish: be dangerous to wild animals

Related concepts

Parents	material Weight: 0.48 , place Weight: 0.47 , refuse Weight: 0.46 , claim Weight: 0.46 , thing Weight: 0.45
Siblings	trash bag Weight: 0.33 , garbage can Weight: 0.32 , slag Weight: 0.32 , compost Weight: 0.31 , garbage truck Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be dangerous to wild animals	1.00
be dangerous to animals	0.94
be dangerous to humans	0.86
have impact on animals	0.77
be harm to humans	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(material, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(material, be dangerous to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(rubbish, have impact on animals)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(rubbish, be harm to humans)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(rubbish, have impact on animals)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(rubbish, be harm to humans)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(rubbish, have impact on animals)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to animals)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(rubbish, be harm to humans)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to humans)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(rubbish, have impact on animals)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be harm to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(material, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(rubbish, be dangerous to wild animals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(material, be dangerous to humans)