running: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
, maneuver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
feel good 0.77
is good thing 0.77
has quality good 0.77
be much bad for life expectancy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(walking, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(walking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(running, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(running, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(running, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(walking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(walking, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(walking, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(walking, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(running, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(running, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(running, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(running, feel good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(running, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(running, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(walking, feel good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(walking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)