running: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
, maneuver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality loss 0.79
is too fast bad 0.77
be much bad for life expectancy 0.76
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(walking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(walking, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(running, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(walking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(walking, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(walking, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(walking, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(running, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(running, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(running, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(running, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(running, has quality loss)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(running, is too fast bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(running, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(running, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(running, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(running, has quality loss)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(running, is too fast bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(running, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality loss)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(running, has quality loss)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(running, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(running, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(running, is too fast bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(running, is too fast bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(running, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(walking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(walking, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(running, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)