salad: cost more than hamburgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more than hamburgers 1.00
cost more than burgers 0.95
be more expensive than burgers 0.91
be more expensive than meat 0.83
cost more 0.82
be healthier than other potatoes 0.80
be healthier than potatoes 0.79
be better than potatoes 0.79
be healthier than white potatoes 0.79
be healthier than regular potatoes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than regular potatoes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than potatoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(potato, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(potato, be healthier than regular potatoes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than regular potatoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(salad, cost more)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(salad, cost more)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(salad, cost more)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(salad, cost more than burgers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(salad, cost more than hamburgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than potatoes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salad, cost more than hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than regular potatoes)