san francisco: was built

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
was built 1.00
was built in place 0.93
was built in first place 0.90
be built on lake 0.81
be built on hills 0.80
was created 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san diego, was built in place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in place)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, was built in first place)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in place)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(san diego, was built in first place)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(san jose, was built)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(san diego, was built in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, was built)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(san diego, was built in place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, was built)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(san francisco, was built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(san jose, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(san jose, was built)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vancouver, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(vancouver, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(san francisco, was built)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be built on hills)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san francisco, be built on hills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san francisco, was built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in place)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san jose, was built)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(vancouver, was created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexico city, be built on lake)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in place)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(san francisco, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, was built in first place)