scarce: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.37
, area
Weight: 0.34
, race
Weight: 0.27
, food
Weight: 0.24
, resource
Weight: 0.22
Siblings public transport
Weight: 0.27
, service station
Weight: 0.27
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.26
, supply
Weight: 0.26
, cold storage
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality resource 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scarce, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scarce, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scarce, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(scarce, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(scarce, has quality resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality resource)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(scarce, has quality resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(scarce, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(scarce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)