scarce: has quality resource

Related concepts

Parents	service Weight: 0.37 , area Weight: 0.34 , race Weight: 0.27 , food Weight: 0.24 , resource Weight: 0.22
Siblings	public transport Weight: 0.27 , service station Weight: 0.27 , internet service provider Weight: 0.26 , supply Weight: 0.26 , cold storage Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality resource	1.00
has quality good	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(scarce, has quality resource)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(scarce, has quality resource)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(scarce, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality resource)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality resource)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(scarce, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(scarce, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(scarce, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(scarce, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(scarce, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(scarce, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, has quality good)