seafood: be considered high risk foods

Related concepts

Parents	food Weight: 0.68 , fresh food Weight: 0.65 , ingredient Weight: 0.64 , meat Weight: 0.62 , kitchen Weight: 0.60
Siblings	eel Weight: 0.65 , shellfish Weight: 0.37 , pet food Weight: 0.37 , tuna Weight: 0.37 , lunch meat Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered high risk foods	1.00
be considered risk foods	0.98
is high risk food	0.92
is risk food	0.90
is most expensive meat	0.76
is expensive meat	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(meat, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(meat, is risk food)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(meat, is high risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(meat, is high risk food)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is high risk food)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is risk food)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(tuna, is high risk food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(meat, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(shellfish, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(shellfish, is risk food)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(tuna, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(tuna, is high risk food)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shellfish, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(shellfish, is high risk food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

Similarity expansion

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is high risk food)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(seafood, is risk food)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(seafood, is risk food)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(seafood, is risk food)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is most expensive meat)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is expensive meat)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(seafood, is expensive meat)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(seafood, is most expensive meat)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(seafood, is expensive meat)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(seafood, is most expensive meat)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(seafood, is high risk food)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive meat)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(seafood, is high risk food)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(seafood, is most expensive meat)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(seafood, is high risk food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(shellfish, is risk food)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(tuna, is high risk food)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(shellfish, is high risk food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)