seafood: be considered risk foods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.68
, fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eel
Weight: 0.65
, shellfish
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.37
, tuna
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered risk foods 1.00
be considered high risk foods 0.98
is risk food 0.91
is high risk food 0.88
be considered vegetarian 0.76
is expensive meat 0.76
is most expensive meat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meat, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(meat, is risk food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(meat, is high risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(meat, is high risk food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is high risk food)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is risk food)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is high risk food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meat, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(shellfish, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shellfish, is risk food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tuna, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tuna, is high risk food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(shellfish, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(shellfish, is high risk food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is high risk food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(seafood, is risk food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(seafood, is risk food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered vegetarian)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(seafood, is risk food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(seafood, be considered vegetarian)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered vegetarian)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(seafood, is high risk food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(seafood, be considered vegetarian)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(seafood, is most expensive meat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(seafood, is high risk food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(seafood, is high risk food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(shellfish, is risk food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tuna, is high risk food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shellfish, is high risk food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)