seafood: is risk food

Related concepts

Parents	food Weight: 0.68 , fresh food Weight: 0.65 , ingredient Weight: 0.64 , meat Weight: 0.62 , kitchen Weight: 0.60
Siblings	eel Weight: 0.65 , shellfish Weight: 0.37 , pet food Weight: 0.37 , tuna Weight: 0.37 , lunch meat Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is risk food	1.00
is high risk food	0.96
be considered risk foods	0.91
be considered high risk foods	0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(meat, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(seafood, is risk food)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(seafood, is risk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(meat, is risk food)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(meat, is high risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(meat, is high risk food)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is high risk food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is risk food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(tuna, is high risk food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(seafood, is risk food)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(meat, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(seafood, is risk food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(shellfish, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(shellfish, is risk food)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(tuna, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(tuna, is high risk food)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shellfish, is high risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(shellfish, is high risk food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(seafood, is risk food)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is high risk food)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(seafood, be considered risk foods)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(seafood, is high risk food)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(seafood, be considered high risk foods)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(seafood, is high risk food)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(seafood, is high risk food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(seafood, is risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(shellfish, is risk food)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(tuna, is high risk food)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(shellfish, is high risk food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(seafood, is risk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)