singapore: be developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents indonesia
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.60
, malaysia
Weight: 0.56
Siblings london
Weight: 0.62
, sabah
Weight: 0.36
, australia
Weight: 0.35
, new york city
Weight: 0.35
, washington
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be developed 1.00
is developed 0.99
be considered developed country 0.88
is developed nation 0.84
was built 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(singapore, be developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york, was built)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(singapore, be developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york, was built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was built)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(australia, be considered developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(australia, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(singapore, be developed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(new york, was built)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(singapore, be developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(australia, is developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(australia, is developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(australia, be considered developed country)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(australia, be considered developed country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(singapore, be developed)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(singapore, be considered developed country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(singapore, be considered developed country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be considered developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(singapore, be considered developed country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(singapore, is developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(singapore, is developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(singapore, was built)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(singapore, was built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(singapore, is developed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(singapore, is developed nation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(singapore, is developed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(singapore, is developed nation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(singapore, was built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(singapore, is developed nation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(singapore, is developed nation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(singapore, be developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(australia, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(australia, be considered developed country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(singapore, be developed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)