singapore: was built

Related concepts

Parents	indonesia Weight: 0.64 , new york Weight: 0.61 , nation Weight: 0.60 , malaysia Weight: 0.56
Siblings	london Weight: 0.62 , sabah Weight: 0.36 , australia Weight: 0.35 , new york city Weight: 0.35 , washington Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was built	1.00
is developed	0.79
be developed	0.78
be considered developed country	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(singapore, was built)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(singapore, was built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(new york, was built)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(australia, be considered developed country)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(australia, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(singapore, was built)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(singapore, was built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(australia, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(australia, is developed)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(australia, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(australia, be considered developed country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(singapore, was built)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(singapore, be considered developed country)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(singapore, be considered developed country)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(singapore, be considered developed country)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(singapore, be considered developed country)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(singapore, is developed)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(singapore, be developed)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(singapore, be developed)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(singapore, be developed)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(singapore, be developed)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(singapore, is developed)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(singapore, is developed)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(singapore, is developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(singapore, was built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new york, was built)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(australia, is developed)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(australia, be considered developed country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new york, was built)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(singapore, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)