new york: was built

Related concepts

Parents	new york city Weight: 0.90 , america Weight: 0.72 , chicago Weight: 0.72 , new england Weight: 0.66
Siblings	new hampshire Weight: 0.73 , washington Weight: 0.71 , las vegas Weight: 0.70 , new yorker Weight: 0.68 , philadelphia Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was built	1.00
was developed	0.83
was established	0.79
was created	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(chicago, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new york, was built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(chicago, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(chicago, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(chicago, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(new york, was built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(new hampshire, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(philadelphia, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(washington, was established) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(washington, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(new york, was built)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(new york, was developed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(new york, was created)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(new york, was established)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(new york, was developed)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(new york, was developed)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(new york, was established)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(new york, was created)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(new york, was established)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(new york, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(new york, was built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(chicago, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(washington, was established)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(new york, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(chicago, was established)