new hampshire: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
was formed 0.84
was established 0.80
was estabilished 0.77
was founded in 1623 0.76
was founded 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maine, was established)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alabama, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mississippi, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mississippi, was created)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alabama, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(alabama, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was estabilished)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mississippi, was created)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(alabama, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
...