new york: was established

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york city
Weight: 0.90
, america
Weight: 0.72
, chicago
Weight: 0.72
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.73
, washington
Weight: 0.71
, las vegas
Weight: 0.70
, new yorker
Weight: 0.68
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was established 1.00
was formed 0.83
was developed 0.81
was created 0.80
was built 0.79
was founded in 1664 0.79
was founded in 1609 0.79
was founded 0.78
was old founded 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chicago, was founded)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chicago, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chicago, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was established)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chicago, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(las vegas, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(new york, was established)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was built)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(new york, was old founded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(new york, was old founded)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, was developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new york, was old founded)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(new york, was formed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(new york, was built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new york, was developed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york, was built)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new york, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(new york, was developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(new york, was founded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded in 1664)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new york, was old founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded in 1609)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(new york, was founded in 1609)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chicago, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(las vegas, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chicago, was founded)