new york: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york city
Weight: 0.90
, america
Weight: 0.72
, chicago
Weight: 0.72
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.73
, washington
Weight: 0.71
, las vegas
Weight: 0.70
, new yorker
Weight: 0.68
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was built 0.83
was created 0.83
was established 0.81
was formed 0.79
was called in 1601 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chicago, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chicago, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chicago, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(new york, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new york, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was built)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new york, was built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(new york, was built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york, was built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new york, was created)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(new york, was formed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(new york, was established)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new york, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chicago, was established)