new hampshire: was founded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
was founded 1.00
was founded in 1623 1.00
was formed 0.81
was established 0.78
was created 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, was established)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(maine, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(maine, was established)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(alabama, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(maine, was established)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was created)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(alabama, was founded)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(alabama, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mississippi, was created)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mississippi, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was founded)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded in 1623)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was established)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maine, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mississippi, was created)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(alabama, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york, was created)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maine, was established)