skate: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, event
Weight: 0.49
, foot
Weight: 0.48
Siblings skating
Weight: 0.34
, ice skating
Weight: 0.33
, hockey game
Weight: 0.32
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.32
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is fucking expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skate, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skate, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hockey stick, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(skate, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(skate, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hockey stick, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey stick, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(skate, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(skate, is fucking expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skate, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice skating, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey stick, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(skate, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)