sloth: be at tree in tropic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tree in tropic 1.00
be at tropic 0.93
be at tropical area 0.82
be at tree 0.81
be at euculiptus tree 0.81
be at tropical forest 0.81
be at tree in jungle 0.80
be at jungle tree 0.80
be at tropical jungle 0.79
be at tree in rainforest 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tropic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tree)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tropical area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lizard, be at tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at tropic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monkey, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tree)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(lizard, be at tropical area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at tropical area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in tropic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tree)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tropical area)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in tropic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tropic)