son: be favored over daughters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be favored over daughters 1.00
get favored over daughters 0.99
be preferred over daughters 0.93
be preferred to daughters 0.90
be more important than daughters 0.86
be preferred over daughters in india 0.85
is treated better than daughters 0.84
be called sons 0.83
be more important than daughter 0.80
be valued more than daughters in china 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, be favored over daughters)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, get favored over daughters)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, get favored over daughters)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, get favored over daughters)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, get favored over daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughters)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, be called sons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(son, be called sons)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(son, be called sons)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(son, be called sons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be favored over daughters)