son: be more important than daughter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than daughter 1.00
be more important than daughters 0.94
be more important than daughter in china 0.93
is treated better than daughters 0.88
be called son 0.84
be valued more than daughters in china 0.83
be preferred over daughters 0.83
be preferred to daughters 0.82
get favored over daughters 0.81
be favored over daughters 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughters)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, get favored over daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, get favored over daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, get favored over daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughters)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, get favored over daughters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be favored over daughters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter)