sonar: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, field
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoke detector
Weight: 0.34
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
is valuable 0.83
were helpful to people 0.82
overload useful 0.79
be useful checking 0.79
were helpful to early people 0.79
be usefull 0.76
is interesting 0.76
be called tool 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(method, overload useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tool, be usefull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, be called tool)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(method, overload useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tool, be usefull)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(method, overload useful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(device, is useful)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tool, be usefull)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tool, be called tool)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is interesting)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be useful checking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sonar, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sonar, is useful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sonar, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sonar, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(method, overload useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sonar, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tool, be usefull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sonar, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sonar, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ultrasound, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(electronic device, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ultrasound, be useful checking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, be useful checking)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ultrasound, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sonar, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is valuable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(sonar, is valuable)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sonar, is valuable)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sonar, is valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sonar, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tool, be usefull)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, overload useful)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ultrasound, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ultrasound, be useful checking)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ultrasound, is interesting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tool, be usefull)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, overload useful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(sonar, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)