sprite: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, soft drink
Weight: 0.60
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.33
, comet
Weight: 0.32
, meteor
Weight: 0.32
, doll
Weight: 0.32
, soda pop
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste good together 0.91
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(doll, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(polygon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(doll, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(doll, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(polygon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(polygon, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sprite, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sprite, taste good together)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good together)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good together)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(sprite, has quality bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(doll, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polygon, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sprite, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)