squirrel: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings owl
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.99
be at dense forest 0.88
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.85
be at field forest and in den 0.84
be at tropical rainforest 0.79
be at it natural habitat 0.77
be at wilderness area away from person 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(owl, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fox, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(owl, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(owl, be at in forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(owl, be at in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(squirrel, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)