statistics: be important in engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
Siblings batting average
Weight: 0.69
, poll
Weight: 0.56
, era
Weight: 0.56
, batting
Weight: 0.52
, prevalence
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in engineering 1.00
be helpful in engineering 0.92
be helpful in electrical engineering 0.89
be used in aerospace engineering 0.88
be taught in field of computer engineering 0.85
be important to engineers 0.83
be important in science 0.80
be important in biology 0.79
be used design 0.77
be needed for science 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in engineering)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in engineering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tool, be needed for science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tool, be important to engineers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important to engineers)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(statistics, be important in engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(statistics, be taught in field of computer engineering)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be taught in field of computer engineering)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(statistics, be taught in field of computer engineering)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(statistics, be taught in field of computer engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(statistics, be used design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(statistics, be used design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(statistics, be used design)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in biology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(statistics, be important in biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(statistics, be important in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be used design)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(statistics, be important in biology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(statistics, be important in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(statistics, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tool, be important to engineers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(statistics, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tool, be important to engineers)