stork: have long beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.46
, alligator
Weight: 0.45
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.35
, robin
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35
, wren
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long beaks 1.00
has physical part beaks 0.94
clap beaks 0.88
clack beaks 0.85
click beaks 0.84
clatter beaks 0.80
have long legs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stork, have long beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long legs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(stork, have long beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(heron, have long legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(heron, have long legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(stork, have long beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(stork, clap beaks)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(stork, clap beaks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(stork, click beaks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(stork, clap beaks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(stork, clack beaks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(stork, clap beaks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(stork, click beaks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(stork, clack beaks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stork, click beaks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(stork, clack beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(stork, clatter beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(stork, click beaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stork, clack beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stork, clatter beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(stork, clatter beaks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stork, clatter beaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stork, have long legs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(stork, have long legs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stork, have long legs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stork, has physical part beaks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stork, have long beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(heron, have long legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stork, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)