storm: be given female names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.66
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
Siblings typhoon
Weight: 0.74
, tornado
Weight: 0.71
, hurricane
Weight: 0.66
, rita
Weight: 0.63
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be given female names 1.00
have female names 0.96
is female names 0.95
be named female names 0.93
be given names 0.91
be given human names 0.88
have women 's names 0.87
be called women 's names 0.87
have names 0.85
get names 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, have female names)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given female names)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, have female names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be given names)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(typhoon, have female names)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(typhoon, have female names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hurricane, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given female names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(typhoon, be given names)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(typhoon, be given names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hurricane, have female names)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hurricane, have female names)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hurricane, be given human names)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be given human names)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(storm, be given female names)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(storm, is female names)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(storm, be given names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(storm, have names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(storm, get names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(storm, be given names)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(storm, be given female names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(typhoon, have female names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(typhoon, be given names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, be given female names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(typhoon, have names)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(storm, be given female names)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hurricane, have female names)
...