strategy: be important in marketing

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.67 , objective Weight: 0.65 , plan Weight: 0.65 , policy Weight: 0.60
Siblings	approach Weight: 0.70 , planning Weight: 0.69 , framework Weight: 0.68 , marketing Weight: 0.65 , consolidation Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in marketing	1.00
be different marketing	0.95
be different from marketing	0.94
marketing to girls	0.87
be different marketing to girls	0.87
be different from conventional marketing	0.82
be different from desktop marketing	0.82
be important in business	0.80
be important to business	0.80
be important in management	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(objective, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in marketing)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(objective, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(objective, be important in business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(objective, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in business)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(objective, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(marketing, be different from desktop marketing)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(marketing, be different marketing to girls)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(marketing, be different from conventional marketing)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in business)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(objective, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(objective, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(planning, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(planning, be important to business)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(planning, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(planning, be important in business)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(marketing, be different marketing to girls) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(marketing, be different marketing to girls)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(marketing, be different from conventional marketing)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(marketing, be different from desktop marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(marketing, be different from desktop marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(strategy, be important in marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to business)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in management)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(strategy, be important to business)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(strategy, be important in management)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to business)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in management)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(strategy, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(objective, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(planning, be important to business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(planning, be important in business)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(marketing, be different from conventional marketing)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(marketing, be different from desktop marketing)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(marketing, be different marketing to girls)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(strategy, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(objective, be important to business)