straw: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents residue
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, fuel
Weight: 0.57
Siblings proboscis
Weight: 0.33
, steel wool
Weight: 0.33
, burlap
Weight: 0.32
, paper towel
Weight: 0.32
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality evil 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(straw, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(straw, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(straw, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(straw, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(straw, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(straw, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(paper towel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(straw, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(straw, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(straw, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(straw, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(straw, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(straw, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(straw, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(straw, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(straw, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(straw, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)