supervisor: CAN can young

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
CAN can young 1.00
need understand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(supervisor, CAN can young)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(manager, need understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(manager, need understand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(supervisor, CAN can young)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(supervisor, CAN can young)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(supervisor, need understand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(supervisor, need understand)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(supervisor, need understand)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, need understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, CAN can young)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(supervisor, CAN can young)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manager, need understand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(supervisor, CAN can young)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manager, need understand)