supervisor: need understand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need understand 1.00
CAN can young 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(supervisor, need understand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(manager, need understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(manager, need understand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(manager, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(supervisor, need understand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(supervisor, need understand)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, CAN can young)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(supervisor, CAN can young)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(supervisor, CAN can young)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(supervisor, CAN can young)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, need understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(supervisor, need understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manager, need understand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(supervisor, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(manager, need understand)