supervisor: delegate responsibility

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
delegate responsibility 1.00
delegate 0.90
fail delegate 0.88
fail delegate effectively 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(manager, delegate)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(manager, delegate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(manager, delegate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(manager, delegate)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(supervisor, delegate responsibility)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(supervisor, delegate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(supervisor, delegate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(manager, delegate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(manager, delegate)