supervisor: fail delegate effectively

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail delegate effectively 1.00
fail delegate 0.95
delegate 0.89
delegate responsibility 0.84
fail 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(manager, delegate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(manager, fail)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(administrator, fail)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(manager, delegate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(administrator, fail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(manager, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(manager, delegate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(manager, delegate)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(manager, fail)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(administrator, fail)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(supervisor, delegate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(supervisor, delegate)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(manager, delegate)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(administrator, fail)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manager, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(manager, delegate)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(administrator, fail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manager, fail)