supervisor: fail delegate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail delegate 1.00
fail delegate effectively 0.95
delegate 0.95
delegate responsibility 0.88
fail 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(manager, delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(manager, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(administrator, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(manager, delegate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(administrator, fail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(manager, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(manager, fail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(administrator, fail)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(manager, delegate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(manager, delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(manager, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(administrator, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail delegate)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(supervisor, delegate)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(supervisor, delegate)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(supervisor, fail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(supervisor, fail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate effectively)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate responsibility)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, delegate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supervisor, fail delegate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(manager, delegate)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(administrator, fail)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manager, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(manager, delegate)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(administrator, fail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(supervisor, fail delegate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manager, fail)