swallowing: feel bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.54
, reflex
Weight: 0.52
, activity
Weight: 0.52
, function
Weight: 0.50
, issue
Weight: 0.50
Siblings eating
Weight: 0.32
, chewing gum
Weight: 0.31
, chewing
Weight: 0.31
, vomit
Weight: 0.31
, gum
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
is weird 0.77
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gum, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(vomit, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chewing, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(eating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chewing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chewing, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chewing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chewing, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(vomit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vomit, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chewing gum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(swallowing, feel bad)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(swallowing, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(swallowing, is weird)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(swallowing, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(swallowing, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, is weird)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(swallowing, is weird)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(swallowing, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(swallowing, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(swallowing, is weird)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(swallowing, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(swallowing, feel bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(chewing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(vomit, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eating, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chewing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(swallowing, feel bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chewing gum, has quality good)