swaziland: is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.47
, location
Weight: 0.44
, south africa
Weight: 0.42
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, central american country
Weight: 0.28
, czech republic
Weight: 0.28
, west germany
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed 1.00
is developed country 0.91
is less developed 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(swaziland, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(swaziland, is less developed)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(swaziland, is developed country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is less developed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is less developed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is developed country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(swaziland, is less developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(swaziland, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(swaziland, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)